McNeese State
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
405  Katja Woelfl SR 20:42
581  Gladys Jerotich JR 20:58
1,592  Alissa Lander FR 22:05
1,612  Lander Alissa FR 22:07
1,698  Imogen Hull SO 22:13
1,873  Alex Eykelbosch JR 22:24
1,914  Jessica Fox FR 22:27
2,354  Edna Cheptum FR 23:02
2,570  Estela Pina SO 23:23
National Rank #146 of 348
South Central Region Rank #11 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 11th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 33.9%
Top 20 in Regional 99.9%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Katja Woelfl Gladys Jerotich Alissa Lander Lander Alissa Imogen Hull Alex Eykelbosch Jessica Fox Edna Cheptum Estela Pina
LSU Invitational 09/16 1292 22:04 21:35 22:39 23:14 23:01
Texas A&M Invitational 09/23 1151 20:52 20:51 22:06 21:47 22:37 23:29 23:16
McNeese State Cowboy Stampede 09/30 1171 20:51 21:02 22:26 21:53 22:24 22:36 23:03 23:33
Princeton Invitational 10/14 1088 20:20 20:56 21:51 22:04 22:40 22:34
Southland Conference 10/27 1179 20:55 21:02 22:07 23:47 22:08 22:11 22:52 23:25
South Region Championships 11/10 1132 20:36 20:58 22:02 22:23 22:08 22:38





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 11.6 344 0.1 2.9 6.6 10.3 14.1 18.2 16.8 11.0 7.9 5.2 3.0 2.3 1.2 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Katja Woelfl 0.4% 193.3


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Katja Woelfl 25.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.9 1.7 2.1 2.4 3.8 4.3 4.5 6.2 5.3 6.1 6.5 5.0
Gladys Jerotich 33.8 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.4 2.0 2.4 2.4 3.4
Alissa Lander 92.2
Lander Alissa 93.9
Imogen Hull 100.5
Alex Eykelbosch 114.0
Jessica Fox 117.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 0.1% 0.1 6
7 2.9% 2.9 7
8 6.6% 6.6 8
9 10.3% 10.3 9
10 14.1% 14.1 10
11 18.2% 18.2 11
12 16.8% 16.8 12
13 11.0% 11.0 13
14 7.9% 7.9 14
15 5.2% 5.2 15
16 3.0% 3.0 16
17 2.3% 2.3 17
18 1.2% 1.2 18
19 0.6% 0.6 19
20 0.1% 0.1 20
21 0.1% 0.1 21
22 0.1% 0.1 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0